| t byfield on Fri, 21 Apr 2000 20:54:00 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> US Low-power radio action alert |
<http://www.counterpunch.org/>
April 20, 2000
....CounterPunch Action Alert....
Low-Power Radio: Mayday! Mayday!
Trust the broadcasting industry to recoil in horror at the prospect of
more choice for the American people, who -- be it never forgotten --
actually own the airwaves this same broadcasting industry claims as
its own. In a shameful vote on April 13, just before the Easter recess
and after furious lobbying by the National Association of Broadcasters
(NAB), the House of Representatives voted 274 to 110 to scuttle one of
the few creditable rulings issued in recent years by the Federal
Communications Commission. If the Senate concurs, Congress will have
issued a stark No to free speech and democratic communications, just
as ruthlessly as any dictator sending troops into a broadcasting
station.
The broadcasting lobby has been on a rampage ever since the FCC voted
on January 20 to authorize license applications for noncommercial FM
stations to begin low-power broadcasting to their communities. Such
stations, with a range of up to ten miles, would be able to get on the
air for as little as $1,000.
The FCC's January ruling came as a welcome surprise amid the pell-mell
concentration of station ownership prompted by the 1996
Telecommunications Act. The FCC acted partly to show it's not an
industry serf, partly to head off the possibility of court rulings
endorsing low-watt radio on free-speech grounds. The very same day as
the House vote, April 13, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
gave a friendly hearing to low-watt pioneer Steve Dunifer, who has
been battling the FCC in court for many years.
Even so, the FCC did bow to industry pressure on a technical question
of enormous importance, the issue of "separation requirements". Old
FCC rules required three separations between one FM station and
another. This meant that if a station is broadcasting on, say, 91.1
another broadcaster couldn't grab 91.3, 91.5 or 91.7. The next
available frequency would be 91.9. This effectively meant that the
only FM frequencies available to new low-power stations were in
virtually uninhabited regions of the country, mostly desert.
Technology has changed greatly since those old rules were made, and by
the new millennium the FCC was prepared to move to a separation
requirement of one, regarded by independent communications engineers
as quite sufficient to preserve the integrity of existing FM signals.
But finally the FCC flinched in the face of fierce NAB pressure, and
its January 20 ruling called for a separation requirement of two,
meaning that there would be no new low-watt stations operating legally
in cities like New York, Los Angeles or San Francisco.
But this still wasn't enough for the broadcasting industry. Even as
the FCC ruling prompted hundreds of excited nonprofit groups to ready
their license applications, NAB lobbyists began to deploy across
Capitol Hill. To befuddled lawmakers these lobbyists played an utterly
fraudulent CD purporting to show the chaos on the airwaves that would
be caused by the new two-separation requirement. Engineers from the
FCC and from legal, church and community groups came to hearings and
demonstrated the fraudulence of the NAB's claims.
But by now lawmakers were being pressed by an NAB ally, formerly
furtive but now brazen in its stance: National Public Radio. Kevin
Klose, president of NPR, stated flatly in a recent Radio World
broadcast that "the American public would not be well served by an FCC
ruling that creates LPFM [low-power FM] at the expense of the existing
public radio services." Klose has good reason to be afraid. Ever since
NPR forced its affiliates to accept nationally syndicated NPR
programming, the proportion of locally originated and
community-oriented programming on these public radio stations has
plummeted, and many listeners are discontented. Low-power FM is a
threat to the NPR empire.
There's another, more sinister factor in NPR's opposition. Both Klose
and the boss of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Robert
Coonrod, come from careers in US government propaganda abroad. Klose
ran Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty, long a stamping ground for
the CIA. Coonrod oversaw the Voice of America and both Radio and TV
Martí. As Peter Franck of the National Lawyers Guild's Committee on
Democratic Communications puts it, "Klose and Coonrod come out of the
national security state. Their instinct is to see federally funded
public radio as an actual or potential propaganda arm of government,
and they're terrified of independent voices." Indeed, Coonrod has been
intimately involved in efforts to curb the independence of stations in
the noncommercial Pacifica network, which is now the object of an
admirable strike by Pacifica Network News reporters.
The awful April 13 House vote came as the consequence of a deal
between Republican Michael Oxley and Democrat John Dingell, whereby
the FCC will be forced to revert to the old three-frequency separation
requirement, which would mean no more than 70 low-watt stations
nationwide, all of them in the boonies. The FCC's two-frequency
separation requirement of January would have allowed for about 1,000
low-watt stations. The bill piously calls for new studies by the FCC
but is emphatic that the commission can never change separation
requirements without congressional authority.
The battle is far from over. Even though the broadcasting industry has
great clout, the low-power radio movement has popular sentiment on its
side, having fought for ten years with ultimate success to prompt the
FCC to that January ruling. The Senate will vote on the issue in early
May, and it's vital that legislators hear from CounterPunchers,
communities, churches and labor as soon as possible. Yes, this means
YOU. The White House favors the FCC's January decision. The Senate
version of the bill will come before John McCain's commerce committee,
so write to him and inquire whether he really is a reformer. Also
write to your senators and their home district staff. Among other
organizations to contact:
National Lawyers Guild's Committee on Democratic Communications at
(415) 522-9814;
Prometheus Radio Project at (215) 476-2385;
Low Power Radio Coalition at (202) 783-5588
Virginia Center for the Public Press
Radio Free Richmond Project
http://members.aol.com/wrfr
CounterPunch
3220 N Street, NW, PMB 346
Washington, DC 20007
1-800-840-3683
email:
counterpunch@counterpunch.org
© Copyright: 2000. All rights reserved.
_________________________________________________________________
CounterPunch is a project of the Institute for the Advancement of
Journalistic Clarity
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net